Re: What will it take?

	Duration: 329 seconds Upload Time: 07-03-06 16:02:04 User: azrienoch :::: Favorites
Description: A few concerns about the setup of this challenge.
Comments
Gnophilist ::: Favorites Hey. In addition to responding with a video, I have made clarifications in the information for the original task. Thank you. :) 07-03-06 21:38:51 _____________________________________________________
azrienoch ::: Favorites No problem at all. 07-03-06 21:52:57 _____________________________________________________
Judelicious1971 ::: Favorites I never really got to grips with the Bertrand Russell and the sets thing, that was a fine explanation, its sinking in my pea brain :) 07-03-06 22:30:57 _____________________________________________________
LionKimbro ::: Favorites He didn't say you have to prove that existence exists; He said you can take it for granted, as an axiom. 07-03-25 18:34:49 _____________________________________________________
azrienoch ::: Favorites My point was that because existence's existence cannot be proved, the axiom is worthless. No proof can come from it. 07-03-25 19:49:31 _____________________________________________________
LionKimbro ::: Favorites Axioms are **always** things that cannot be proved. Otherwise, it's not an axiom. All logical proofs are based in axioms. "The shortest distance between two points is a line" is an axiom. 07-03-26 12:30:52 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
azrienoch ::: Favorites Look up "constructivism." 07-03-26 12:38:33 _____________________________________________________